Why I Wear the Muslim Hijab - A Discussion
3 11 2006WARNING: Remember, my comment policy warns you that this blog is a dictatorship! This is WriteousSisterLand, and I am Queen, President, Jefa, Amira and all that! It’s my space and I get to say what I want. If you don’t like it, feel free to click your way back out of my Land. If you can handle it, read on.
Quite some time ago, on my old blog, I posted a short article entitled “Why I Wear the Muslim Hijab”. It was written in response to the many questions I was receiving at that time about why I chose to wear a headscarf. In many cases, the questions arose because in my particular community, though a good-sized city, it is extremely rare to see a Muslim woman and recognize her as such because few wear hijab outside the masjid. And many people were discovering that women they knew were in fact Muslim, but they hadn’t realized it because these Muslim women dressed just like them. So when they met a woman like me, they were confused as to why I would hold on to such an “antiquated” aspect of my beliefs when as far as they could see it was not really necessary anymore.
Now, not wanting to start argument, I will also bluntly say that I am a LOVER of niqaab, or face veil. I have worn it over various spaces of time since being Muslim, although I currently do not. I fully support every woman’s right to dress as modestly as she feels is appropriate.
Anyhow, that article about why I wear hijab was picked up by IslamOnline.net (affectionately known as IOL) and published there, resulting in emails from all over the world ever since. It’s been more than a year since and I still receive at least one email a month about it, mashaAllah. Most are supportive and pleasant. Today I received an unusual email. It was not unsupportive or negative, just questionning in a way I had not previously received.
Well, first, you should go read my article so you know what we’re talking about here.
Also, before I post the email and my response, I’d like to point you to a really cool post on a brother’s blog. Arshad pokes some holes in Jack Straw’s comments about the Islamic face veil. He also provides some awesome links to different women’s views on the face veil (and, I’m blushing, he included the link to my hijab article too) as well as a link that explains the concept of modesty that many Christian women continue to believe in and practice (you’ll see why this is particularly relevent when you read the email I received). So go check out Arshad’s post to at http://justlybalanced.blogspot.com/2006/10/veil-off-with-jack-straw.html
Okay, now that you are back, here is the email I received. Yes, I am protecting his identity and not revealing anything to you about who he is!
Dear Aaminah,
I have just read your article about women’s headscarf. In this article you said “There are verses in the Qur’an and in the collected words of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), as well as collected norms and behaviors of the wives of the Prophet and his Companions that show clearly that covering of the entire body and head was enjoined upon and practiced by the early Muslim women.” Can you be more specific, and tell me were in the Qur’an, it is said that women should wear a headscarf. As far as I know the headscarf is related to culture and not religion. My grandmother used to wear a headscarf and she was a passionate Catholic…in Spain most women used to wear the headscarf. Nowdays most Eastern European women, most of which are Christians, wear headscarves. I will appreciate if you could make a point on why the headscarf is related to only Muslim women.
And, my response, which I hope is coherent enough to help both the man who wrote me and to clarify points for anyone else who finds this issue confusing. Thank you for your email. However, I am afraid that you have quite completely misunderstood what my article was about and what its statements were. First, you must realize that the particular article was intended primarily for a Muslim audience, but also as a manner of reaching out to non-Muslims who consistently question why I would wear a headscarf. When non-Muslims ask me why I am wearing a headscarf, they are not looking for a detailed history of women’s headcoverings. They are asking me specifically why I believe in it and choose to practice it, and that is intrinsically tied to my Islam.
In no way whatsoever does the article state or imply that the headscarf was mandated to Muslim women only. You have, I’m afraid, completely misconstrued that.
You are also seriously incorrect in your assumption that the wearing of a headscarf is purely cultural with no basis in religion. The covering of the head is mandated in the Old Testament and was practiced by pious Jewish women. It is also mandated to Christian women in the New Testament and there are traditional Christian women who continue to practice this belief as a part of their spiritual obligation, not merely culture (Amish, Mennonite, Mormon, Orthodox, etc.). Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the final revelation in a long line of revelations that included parts of what are now known as the Jewish Torah and the Christian Bible. This should clarify to you that the covering of a woman’s head is indeed based in religious values and morals first and foremost.
Sadly, the modern reality is that most Christian and Jewish women have decided that the mandate to dress modestly, much less to cover their heads, is no longer necessary. In some cultures, and in the older generations, such modesty is still viewed as an expectation or at least a norm which they continue to accept. Which is why many Christian women in Eastern Europe continue to cover “culturally” because it is just normal or comfortable or serves another purpose of convenience to them, but they may or may not believe in any religious implication in that covering. This is also why you will still find many old women in Spain and Latin America who cover; it is a habit from a different time period and culture that they have retained. In many (though certainly not all) cases, the original religious or spiritual requirement of that dress code has been forgotten and it is only being practiced as part of culture. But this does not negate the fact that it originated in a spiritual tradition.
Personally, I can tell you about Central American churches that are not Catholic in my own neighborhood where the women continue to cover their head prior to entering the church. Many also dress very modestly outside of church, even if without headcovering. They do this because they spiritually believe in modesty as a moral value, not only because it is part of their culture.
In fact, there are even Muslim women who do not accept that headcovering is necessary for them, although they do not have the support of any Islamic scholar in this choice. And there are Muslim men who feel that it is old-fashioned or unnecessary in this day and age, despite the clear injunction for it. In general though, you will find that more Muslim women do continue to practice it than those that don’t, and of many who do not practice it the reason is due to the difficulty they feel it imposes on them but they continue to believe in it and recognize that they are sinning to not be wearing it.
In specific answer to your question for verses, it would be unnecessary for me to point to them for you because if you are not Muslim and familiar with the context of the verses, they will mean nothing to you or can be easily misunderstood. In fact, there is no verse in the Qur’an which specifies that Muslim women must cover their heads; instead it specifies that women must cover their entire bodies and draw their coverings across their necks and chests. The reason it does not specify head covering is because head covering was assumed at that time due to previous revelations (at that time ALL Jewish and Christian women covered their heads) and cultural practice, and it was only necessary to clarify that the chest (the setting being pagan Arabia that it was originally addressed to, where women also wore headcoverings in many cases but left their breasts fully exposed) needed to also be covered. It is actually through the sayings of the Prophet on what constitutes appropriate women’s dress, and on the history of the practice of the women of his time, including his own wives and daughters, that we are able to ascertain the exact “level” of coverage that is expected of Muslim women. Even so, scholars continue to debate whether covering of the face is indeed required, preferred but not required, or simply an acceptable practice. But there is no debate whatsoever amongst legitimate Islamic scholars that the minimum of coverage for a Muslim woman is that only her face and hands may be exposed publicly.
That is not to say that non-Muslim women cannot or should not cover. In fact, I personally know of many women who do so and I fully support them doing so. I have even personally known self-avowed pagan women of many persuasions who believed that modest dress and full coverage was part of their spiritual practice. And of course it is also a cultural practice as well and there is nothing wrong with that.
But it is not my place to remind non-Muslim women of their obligations and responsibilities, or where they may be lacking. As a Muslim woman, I only have the right to speak to what is expected of Muslim women, how I personally incorporate that expectation into my own life, and how I have interpreted Islam’s injunctions upon me as a Muslim woman.
I hope that this is helpful to you in clarifying the issues you have brought up.
Love the “warning” sis…
wasalaam
Your point is certainly “coherent” and very balanced in thought and expression–culture cannot be split off from religion, ever. In the UK, a person might say that they are an atheist and live in a secular society…only culture matters, but they live in the shadow of a Christian-cultural state. The connection is always there. You only have to look at the wearing of scarfs at funerals to see the connection between religion and cultural upbringing and the awareness that modesty is a respectful norm. Do preserve your absolute rule over comments and ideas!
salaam i have not read yet full plz send it to my email ok thank you….
kashif407@yahoo.co.in
Skashif_hussain1
kashif.rock@hotmail.com.
thankyou ….
Assalaam alaykum,
Sister that was a very well-written article on hijab. Many Muslims are not aware, but the Qur’anic verses are mandating hijab. The verse in surah Nur uses “khimar” which is a headcovering. It is already understood that the women of the time were covering their heads already, but with the scarf tied behind, so Allah is telling them to draw the scarf over their necks and chest to also cover that area. Anyway, here’s a link to sunnipath where they explain it better. Concerning the standard explanation of the verse of hijab
Also, though I’m not a scholar I have noticed where the verse in surah Nur speaks to “believing” women, not just Muslim women. Maybe that makes a difference, Allahu alim.
Shaharazed, those are some of the thoughts I shared when I read the post. True the man who sent the email, acknowlged that other women wore ‘headscarvs’, but they were not reealed to them to be wore the way the ‘khimar’is. I can’t believe that out of the entire article, that was what he took out of it.
[...] Aaminah Hernandez presents Why I Wear the Muslim Hijab - A Discussion posted at Aaminah Hernandez. [...]
Very well written, sis. Anyway, if you’re looking at this so-called moderate Muslim in Malaysia (mostly Malay Muslims), you’re going to find something stupid going on. They’re (mostly) wearing it because of fashion, parents order and/or to hide their “ugliness”.
What do you think about this sis?
You have made a mistake in your discussion of head covering and non-Muslim faiths. Head covering at all times is NOT mandated to Christian women in the New Testament. What St. Paul does write, is that women should cover their heads in Church. Christian women did cover their heads elsewhere during the Middle Ages, but in fact this WAS due to the cultural understanding of the time, and not due to anything mandated in the Bible (that is, the New Testament - which is authoritative for the Christian faith).
Reka, I must respectfully tell you that you are mistaken. This is only one interpretation of the verses, and there are many Christian groups that continue to exist to today (such as Mennonites) who do not interpret them in that way but take them to mean coverage at all times in public.
You also must understand that I do not believe the Bible as it exists today is complete. It has been messed with by so many men wanting to make it palatable to their own times that much has been changed and/or lost. I am not talking just about the “Middle Ages” but about the time of Jesus in which women did cover their heads.
And Paul is NOT authoritative for the Christian faith necessarily. He was neither a prophet nor one who had direct association with Jesus, so many of his ideas are just that: ideas.
However, that said, I do not allow argumentation on this blog. I am not going to debate Christian theology or history with you. You don’t have to agree with me, and you will not make me agree with you.
I am a christian girl that has been looking into the Islamic religion. I am wanting to know more about something you said in the above in answer to the mans email:
“women also wore headcoverings in many cases but left their breasts fully exposed”
So was it that they were not wearing other clothes on there uper body that the Prophet said that they must cover there chest? Then if thats they case, If you are wearing a modest shirt then the chest wouldn’t have to be coverd?
I am a Christian who wears a head covering all the time and found your article interesting! Thanks for letting me read it.